Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Allen v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 2004No. A03A2526Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMiller, Judge

While I fully concur with the majority’s conclusions in Divisions 1-3,1 must respectfully dissent from the court’s holding in Division 4 that the trial court properly considered Allen’s 1997 DUI nolo plea in aggravation of his sentence when the State made no showing that Allen’s prior plea was voluntary (after Allen showed an irregularity in the taking of the prior plea).

The majority cites to Grant v. State, 231 Ga. App. 868 (501 SE2d 27) (1998), for the proposition that a defendant may not collaterally attack a prior DUI plea that is used against the defendant for sentencing purposes in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. EarpSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Carswell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. McLeod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Earp v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API