Brown v. Earp
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Justice.
We are called upon in this appeal to decide whether the 180-day period of limitation in OCGA § 40-13-33 (a) applies to all collateral attacks on misdemeanor traffic convictions or only to attacks by petition for habeas corpus relief. The question arose in Brown’s appeal to superior court from the decision of the Department of Public Safety declaring him a habitual violator and revoking his driver’s license. The superior court ruled that Brown’s effort in that appeal to make a collateral attack on some of the convictions on which his designation as a habitual violator was based…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nicholson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Hardison v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Earp v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
3Cited by17 opinions
- Balkcom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Legum v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Fulton County v. ColonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Munye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Spalding County Board of Elections v. McCordSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.