Legal Opinion

Winn v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1999No. 4-99-0173PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knecht

In June 1998, plaintiffs, Diana and Danelle Winn, filed a complaint in Champaign County against defendant, Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc., under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1996)). Defendant argued venue was improper and moved to transfer the case to McLean County. The trial court allowed discovery to proceed to determine whether venue was proper in Champaign County. Before the trial court ruled on defendant’s motion to transfer, plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss. In January 1999,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Solich v. George & Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Branson v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Zekman v. Direct American Marketers, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Solich v. George and Anna Portes Cancer Prevention Center of Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. Nancy A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. Gass v. Anna Hospital Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Cianci v. Safeco Ins. Co. of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. In re Estate of LaPlumeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  5. Cianci v. Safeco Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API