Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 2008No. 4398PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Dexter Antonio Williams (Williams) appeals the Post-Conviction Relief (PCR) judge’s finding that Williams’ trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to move to exempt Williams from sexual offender status and for not advising Williams he would be required to register as a sexual offender unless the trial court ordered otherwise. We affirm.

FACTS

Williams pled guilty to kidnapping, two counts of armed robbery, possession of a stolen motor vehicle, failure to stop for a blue light, and possession of a gun by a person under the age of twenty-one. Pursuant to section 23-3-430(0(15) of the South…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Joseph F. Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  3. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. WallsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Magyar v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. LatimoreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  4. John Anthony Magyar v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Magyar v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API