Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 10, 2005No. 2D04-5509PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CANADY, Judge.

David Hill raised four claims in a motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and a fifth rule 3.800(a) claim in a supplemental motion. The trial court denied the four claims in Hill’s original rule 3.800(a) motion. We affirm the denial of these claims without further comment.

On appeal, Hill correctly points out that the trial court failed to address the claim raised in his supplemental motion that a habitual violent felony offender sentence was imposed without proper prior notice. The unaddressed claim alleged that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Berry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James E. McNair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API