Berry v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Christopher Berry appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to his Apprendi1 claim without comment. See Jones v. State, 791 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Although the trial court failed to address Berry’s second claim, we affirm as to it because, as presented, it is not cognizable in a postconviction proceeding. See McDaniel v. State, 683 So.2d 597 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (holding that claim that special condition of probation was illegal was not cognizable pursuant to rule 3.800(a)); Hardman v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- McDaniel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Hardman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005