Legal Opinion

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Weinberg

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 10, 1961No. Civ. 12362PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has moved to remand this condemnation suit to the Superior Court of Baltimore City, whence it was removed to this Court by a petition alleging diversity jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a municipal corporation of the State of Maryland, filed a petition for condemnation in the State Court on July 19, 1960, naming as defendants Harry Weinberg, Jeanette Weinberg, his wife, Morton Weinberg and Joseph Weinberg. Harry, Jeanette and Morton, the owners of the property sought to be condemned, are citizens of Pennsylvania. Joseph is a citizen of Maryland. At the time of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  2. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Meyer v. Construction CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1879

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heniford v. American Motors Sales Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
  2. Stonybrook Tenants Association, Inc. v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  3. Robinson v. Quality InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1986
  4. F & L DRUG CORP. v. American Central Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  5. Horak v. Color Metal of Zurich, SwitzerlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API