Legal Opinion

Bourne v. Northern Counties Title Insurance Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1935No. Civ. 9278PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, J., pro tem.

The sole question presented by this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant and appellant, Northern Counties Title Insurance Company.

The action is one for damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile collision between an automobile operated by him and one belonging to appellant, which at the time of the accident was being operated by the defendant Bollinger, who admittedly at that time was in appellant’s employ. It may be conceded, therefore, that an inference arose from…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kish v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. McWhirter v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Gousse v. LoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Geist v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Martinelli v. StabnauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Hennelly v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Mangrum v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API