Koeppel v. Schroder
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action to permanently enjoin the defendants from contacting and/or communicating with those persons who, up to and including January 21, 1986, had active legal matters pending with and were represented by the law firm of Koeppel, Sommer & Del Casino, P. C., or its predecessor firms, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Murphy, J.), dated June 20, 1986, as granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the defendants from contacting and/or communicating with those clients of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Demov, Morris, Levin & Shein v. GlantzNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Fred Siegel Co., L.P.A. v. Arter & HaddenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Lerman v. Medical Associates of WoodhullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Perry v. International Transport Workers' FederationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Automotive Electric Service Corp. v. Association of Automotive Aftermarket DistributorsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.