Armour and Company v. Swift & Company
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT and CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PERRY, District Judge.
This action came on for trial before the court without a jury. The issues were duly tried and the court heard oral argument of counsel for the parties. Post-trial briefs were filed by the parties and the court has read and considered them. Now, being fully advised in the premises, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. This is a patent infringement action brought by Armour and Company against Swift & Company for infringement of United States Letters Patent 3,285,752.
2. Armour and…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Armour and Company v. Swift & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- In re HellsundCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973