Legal Opinion
Wilkinson v. United States
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided April 14, 2004No. A1-03-02Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiffs allege they have been deprived of the use of rental income derived from land located on the Fort Berthold Reservation. The land has been held in trust for their parents by the United States. On February 2, 2004, the Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiffs filed a response to the motion on February 25, 2004. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs, Virgil Wilkinson, Charles…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Terry Graning, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Sherburne County Bruce Anderson, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.