Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 28, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant effectively waived his right to counsel at the resentencing, as he voluntarily proceeded pro se, with the assistance of standby counsel, as he had done from the pretrial stages of this litigation until this appeal (cf. People v Slaughter, 78 NY2d 485, 491 [1991]). Moreover, contrary to the contention of the defendant in his pro se supplemental brief, his resentence does not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630 [2011]; People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198, 214 [2010], cert denied 562 US —, 131 S Ct 125 [2010]).

The questions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. LingleNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. SlaughterNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Matter of Jackson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. Jackson v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Jackson v. Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional & Community SupervisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Jackson v. The Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional And Community SupervisionDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  5. People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API