Legal Opinion

Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1954No. Civ. 19742Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover for the value of merchandise purchased from plaintiff by defendant, defendant appeals.

Viewing the evidence as we must in the light most favorable to plaintiff (respondent) pursuant to the rules set forth in Estate of Isenberg, 63 Cal.App.2d 214, 216 [2] [146 P.2d 424], the record discloses that defendant, whose place of business was in Los Angeles, visited plaintiff in the city of New York for the purpose of purchasing merchandise; that plaintiff showed him certain samples of milan straw…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Urbansky v. KutinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Higgins v. California Prune & Apricot Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  4. Jones v. Le May-Lieb Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Cohen v. John Curtin, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API