Legal Opinion

Howard v. Boyce

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Appellant has made no motion to vacate the judgment rendered in 1945, nor have any parties named as plaintiffs made such a motion except movants Penelope Overton and Alexander Badham. The only parties before the court seeking an adjudication of their rights at the May 1961 Term were movants Overton, Badham, and respondent Boyce. Their appearance, voluntary or by process duly issued and served, authorized the court to determine their rights inter se. The court had no power to declare or deny a right to one not seeking a determination of his rights. Howard v. Boyce, supra; Peel v. Moore, 244…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. William Falls v. . Robert F. GambleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. Allred v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Johnson v. . WhildenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Peel v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howard v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Howard v. BoyceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API