Johnson v. . Whilden
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Petition- to rehear cause decided by this Court at Spring Term, 1914, and reported in 166 N. 0., 104. Petition having been allowed, the cause was again duly considered and the former judgment affirmed.
1Opinion of the Court
Petition having been allowed, the cause was again duly considered and the former judgment affirmed. The facts relevant to the present inquiry are fully stated in a former decision in the cause, reported in 166 N.C. 104, and from these facts it appears that plaintiff Fred S. Johnson is successor of Jacob Burnett, a former trustee, now deceased, and the (154) co-plaintiffs are the latter's sons and heirs at law; that the lands in controversy, bought with money of the Tuckaseigee Mining Company, a foreign corporation, were held by Jacob Burnett, the original trustee, "in trust and with full…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Fowler v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Doyle v. . Brown, GuardianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
- Harris v. LesterIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- England v. . GarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Stevens v. TurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Clark v. Carolina Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.