Legal Opinion
United States v. Karil Mukai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1994No. 92-30463PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL.
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
The government appeals Karil Mukai’s sentence and the district court’s refusal to allow it to withdraw from its plea agreement. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the questions of law presented in this appeal, see United States v. Fernandez, 960 F.2d 771, 772 (9th Cir.1992), and reverse and remand for resentencing.,
I
Karil Mukai entered into a plea agreement with the government whereby she agreed to enter pleas of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Anne E. Cunavelis, A/K/A KikiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Roman A. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ronald H. SemlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Joseph BurruezoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. George Ralph HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Terry L. PevelerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- In Re MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Rose Hajay BernardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David A. VeriCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.