Legal Opinion
United States v. David A. Veri
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1997No. 96-2083PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant David A. Veri appeals from the district court’s decision that it lacked authority to depart downward from the guideline sentencing range specified in Veri’s plea agreement because the agreement was made pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(1)(C). 1 We conclude a plea agreement specifying a sentence at a particular guideline range is specific enough to fall within the language of 11(e)(1)(C), and that the district court correctly determined it lacked authority to depart downward in this case: Veri’s plea agreement specified a sentence at offense level sixteen and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Dean A. LambeyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Rodolfo Espinoza Abarca, United States of America v. Espinoza Rodolfo AbarcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ervin Earl RutterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. LonjoseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Chavez-SalaisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SiedlikCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.