Legal Opinion

Ratcliff v. Lee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1948No. 33081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, V.C.J.

By this action plaintiff, Hugh Ratcliff, seeks possession of a lockbox and its contents, in the Fidelity National Bank in Oklahoma City. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Orville D. Lee died December 5, 1945, leaving his widow Abba M. Lee, who, as administratrix, is the principal defendant herein, and his son, Ronald D. Lee. Plaintiff, who lived at Vinita, Okla., was his nephew. Mrs. Lee filed suit for divorce in July, 1943, which action was still pending at the time of her husband’s death. That action was arduously contested and, in its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Fouts v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Byrd v. McKoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Seran v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Lucia v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Burbridge v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API