Nuveen v. Nuveen
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Michiel Nuveen appealed from an order holding him in contempt of court for failing to pay a property settlement as ordered in an amended divorce judgment. We affirm, concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion when it held Michiel Nuveen in contempt of court.
I
[¶ 2] Michiel' and Elizabeth Nuveen married in 1991. Michiel Nuveen sued for divorce in 2007, and a partial judgment of divorce was entered reserving most financial issues for a later trial. After a five-day trial, an amended judgment resolving the financial issues was entered on April 26,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Sall v. SallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cashmore v. CashmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Peterson v. SchulzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017