Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Dowdle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1924No. 9332Published

1Dissent

I find myself at variance with the majority of the court on the law of this case. At a former day, the court reversed and rendered the cause in favor of appellant. I agreed to that disposition of the case at the time, but on careful reconsideration I cannot escape the conviction that the court committed error. I will state the grounds of my dissent.

The action of the majority is bottomed on the idea that the evidence is insufficient to raise the issue of the existence of a common-law marriage between Mary Dowdle, appellee, and Lucius Dowdle at the time of his death in February, 1918; that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yates v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Edelstein v. J.M. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Eaton v. EatonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Davis v. WhitlockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  5. Dowdle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API