Legal Opinion

Dowdle v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1923No. 476-3862PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Plaintiff in error, Mary Dow-dle, filed this suit in district court against defendant in error, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, to recover on a policy under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. Supp. 1918, arts. 5246 — 1 to 5246 — 91), as an appeal from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board, alleging that she was the surviving common-law wife of Lucious Dowdle, and as such entitled to recover by reason of an accident resulting in his death on February 5, 1918.

The defendant'in error in its answer denied that plaintiff-in error was the wife of deceased. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Chapman v. SneedTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Odle v. Frost, Barry & LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Cook v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1857

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Roberson Farm Equipment Company v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Williams v. TookeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Buttrill v. Occidental Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. De Beque v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API