Legal Opinion

Stark v. Miller

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided August 2, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bernard Fuchs, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss on the ground that this action is barred by the Comprehensive Automobile Insurance Reparations Act (Insurance Law, art 18). The complaint alleges personal injuries inflicted on August 23, 1975 in New York by the negligent collision of defendant’s automobile with the uninsured vehicle plaintiff drove.

Subdivision 1 of section 673 of the statute provides that a "covered person” may not recover from another "covered person” for personal injuries from negligent use of a motor vehicle in New York except for economic (generally…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Scarpelli v. MarshallNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Marc-Charles v. KrugCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patrello v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Laba v. PetrulloNassau County District Court · 2002
  3. Woodbine v. We Try Harder, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API