Legal Opinion

Fountain v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1910No. S.F. No. 5542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to recover upon a policy of insurance issued by the defendant, covering goods of the plaintiff contained in a two-story brick building situated in the city of Santa Rosa, known as the Shea Building. It had twe store rooms on the ground floor, one of which was occupied by Fountain. The second floor was divided into rooms used and occupied for offices and one room which was occupied by the society of “Eagles” as a lodge room. The defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial, after a verdict for the plaintiff.

The policy contained the following clause:—■

“If…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bastian v. British American Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Clayburgh v. Agric. Ins. Co. of WatertownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. Ted Montford, AKA Theodore F. MontfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Solomon v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Coniglio v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Davis v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Panhans v. Associated Indemnity Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API