Legal Opinion

Newsom v. . Earnheart

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Civil ActioN tried at Fall Term, 1881, of Rowan Superior Court, before Eure, J. Verdict and judgment for defendant, appeal by plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The defendant took into his possession and impounded a cow, belonging to the feme plaintiff and found running at large on his unenclosed land within the limits of the territory hereinafter defined, for the recovery of possession whereof and damages for detaining, the present action is prosecuted. The defendant justifies the taking by virtue of certain acts of the general assembly, to the provis ions of which, so far as they bear upon the matters in dispute and tend to elucidate and explain them, it becomes necessary to advert.

In 1879 an act was passed rendering it unlawful for any live stock…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte WallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sanderlin v. LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Davis v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Hill v. . SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Reed v. Howerton Engineering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  5. Sanderlin v. . LukenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API