Cherene v. First American Financial Corp. Long-Term Disability Plan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, DENYING Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and REMANDING to Plan Administrator
JENKINS, District Judge.
This is an Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) lawsuit regarding plaintiff Beatrice Cherene’s long-term disability benefits. Now before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment by plaintiff and defendants First American Financial Corporation Long-Term Disability Plan and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Hartford”). Having reviewed the memorandum submitted by the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Raithaus v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2004
- QUIRK v. VILLAGE CAR COMPANY INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020