Legal Opinion

Jones v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1875PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the court of common pleas of Hennepin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, J.1

In April, 1874, defendant gave plaintiffs, through their agent, a written order-in these words : “ You will please ship to me from the factory to Bass Lake station, care of J. H. Lohman, on or before the 1st day of July, 1874, one of the Marsh harvesters, for which I agree to pay you or your agent, in cash and notes, on the arrival of the machine, two hundred and twenty dollars, as follows : note, $110, Nov. 1, 1874; note for $110, due Nov. 1, 1875, with interest.” At the time when the order was given, plaintiffs’ agent agreed to sell and ship the harvester in accordance with the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corning & Norton v. Colt & NowlandNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Ohio Confection Co. v. Eimon Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Banik v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. BalfanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Hoover v. MaherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API