Legal Opinion

Namad v. Salomon Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 14, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ethel B. Danzig, J.), entered April 27, 1988, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, reversed, on the law, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs.

This action arises out of a written employment contract between plaintiff William Ñamad and defendant Philipp Brothers, Inc. (Philipp Brothers [a division of defendant Salomon Inc.]), which employed plaintiff on an at-will basis from *3861966 to 1983. In early 1983, plaintiff negotiated an employment contract with Mr. David Tendler, then the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Chemical Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Rosenberg v. Del-Mar Division, Champion International Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Schacht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Clark v. American Morgan Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Triton Partners LLC v. Prudential Securities Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Backer v. LewitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Bonczek v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Myskina v. Condé Nast Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  5. Gruber v. J.W.E. Silk, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API