Legal Opinion

Hostetter Co. v. Conron

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 25, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit for unfair competition in trade. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an action to restrain unfair trade. The defendant is charged with having sold a cheap imitation article as genuine Hostetter’s Bitters. These bitters are prepared only by the complainant. They are made by a secret formula. The law applicable to this situation is well settled and need not again be stated. *738Hostetter Co. v. Brueggeman-Reinert Distilling Co. (C. C.) 46 Fed. 188; Same v. Sommers (C. C.) 84 Fed. 333; Same v. Bower (C. C.) 74 Fed. 235; Same v. Comerford (C. C.) 97 Fed. 585. The only question is one of fact. The testimony of the complainant’s witnesses is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hostetter Co. v. Brueggeman-Reinert Distilling Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1891
  2. Hostetter Co. v. BowerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  3. Hostetter Co. v. SommersU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897
  4. Hostetter Co. v. ComerfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Wine Growers' Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
  2. Samuel Bros. & Co. v. Hostetter Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API