Legal Opinion

Hostetter Co. v. Comerford

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided November 14, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a suit in equity for unfair competition and fraud. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

The bill charges the defendants with fraud and unfair dealing in selling cheap, spurious bitters to their customers as genuine Hostetter’s bitters. It is alleged that tills fraud is accomplished by refilling empty bottles, having the trademarks and labels of the complainant, with the imitation article. The charge is a grave one. The defendants are accused of perpetrating a contemptible fraud not only upon the complainant but upon the public as well. The accusation is one which, if sustained, will brand the defendants as common cheats and impostors, outside the pale of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hostetter Co. v. BowerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hostetter Co. v. ConronU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901
  2. Hostetter Co. v. Gallagher StoresU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1905
  3. Baglin v. Cusenier Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API