In re the Arbitration between Trump & Carmel Fifth, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla. Moskowitz, J.), entered May 7, 2002, which denied petitioners’ application to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The broad arbitration provision contained in the agreement between petitioner 767 Manager, LLC and respondent Carmel Fifth, LLC, which agreement includes a buy/sell provision, encompasses the subsequent buyout agreement executed by the contracting parties’ principals, which makes specific reference to the buy/sell right. The parties’ present dispute respecting the exercise of the buy/sell right is thus arbitrable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. v. MirvishNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In the Arbitration between Franklin Central School & Franklin Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rio Algom, Inc. v. Sammi Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Hirschfeld Productions, Inc. v. MirvishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Philip Morris Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of BRG Sports, LLC v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015