Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Huebsch Laundry Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 3, 1947No. 9186PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Refusal to vacate a consent judgment, entered in an OPA treble damage suit, is the basis of the grievance which defendant brings to us for review.

A short statement of the specific facts follows: Defendant is in the family laundry business in and about Milwaukee. It employs a number of driver salesmen, whose duties are to pick up bundles as directed by its customers, and take them to the laundry where the services are performed. When the laundry service is completed, the driver delivers the packages to the customers, and collects the charges made. He is paid a commission.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Zimmern v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. McArthur v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Palace Hardware Co. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. DunnahooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Smith v. Widman Trucking & Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Thomas Boyd Kellum and Jane K. KellumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  4. Vincent J. Menier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. Farrell Ex Rel. Farrell v. Dome LaboratoriesAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API