Greenbriar Village, L.L.C v. City of Mountain Brook
District Court, N.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOWDRE, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the Defendant’s Motion to Alter, Vacate or Amend 1 (Document 41). After reviewing the submissions of counsel and the court’s Order and Memorandum Opinion of May 20, 2002, the court concludes that the defendant’s motion is due to be DENIED.
The basic thrust of the defendant’s motion rests on two theories: that notice to Saiia Construction complied with the constitutional requirement of notice prior to deprivation of a vested property right and, alternatively, that Greenbriar had post-deprivation remedies available to it.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.