Legal Opinion

Lindemann v. City of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

This action, so far as the city and its officers are concerned, is brought to recover damages resulting from the revocation of a building permit issued by the city of Kenosha through its building inspector. The demurrer specifically raises the question as to whether the complaint states a cause of action against the demurring defendants. Since the complaint demands relief in the alternative against the city and its officers named, it will be necessary to consider whether the complaint states a cause of action against *369the city and/or the members of its council and/or its building inspector.

May…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. McCormick v. BurtIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Apfelbacher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Roerig v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  3. Keller v. City of Council Bluffs, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. City of Tyler v. IngramTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Darlington v. Board of Councilmen of FrankfortCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API