Legal Opinion
Burton v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 17, 1989No. 13426PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court erred in concluding that the late filing of the plaintiff’s brief required granting of the motion to dismiss filed by one of the defendants. Burton v. Planning Commission, 13 Conn. App. 400, 536 A.2d 995 (1988). We affirm the Appellate Court’s decision.
The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. On July 15, 1986, the plaintiff, Nancy Burton, appealed to the Superior Court from a decision of the named defendant, the planning commission of the town of Redding, approving the application of the codefendant, James E. McMurray, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pepe v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- In Re MongilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Hughes v. BemerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Burton v. Planning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Lo Sacco v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ZoravaliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Sabino v. RuffoloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Southport Manor Convalescent Center, Inc. v. FoleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.