Legal Opinion

People v. Valenzuela

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 2001No. E029624PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

The appellate department of the Riverside Superior Court affirmed a trial court holding that knowledge is not an element of the crime defined in Penal Code section 466.5, possession of a master key with the intent to commit an unlawful act. The appellate department then granted defendant’s request that the case be certified to this court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 911 and California Rules of Court, rules 62 and 63. Under that procedure, a certification is appropriate when it appears that a transfer is necessary to secure uniformity of decision…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. DuarteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. Jorge M.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HagedornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. Gant CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API