Legal Opinion

People v. Maglaya

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1991No. Docket 4,091PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, convicted of armed robbery, * alleges that several errors occurred in the lower court trial. Most of the errors alleged relate to the prosecution’s principal witness, a confessed participant in the robbery. The witness spent time in a mental institution, but had been adjudged sane by the probate court about one month before the crime occurred. At trial, defendant moved to exclude the witness’s testimony as incompetent, and alternatively requested that the witness testify in the absence of the jury. The court denied defendant’s requests. Defendant did not object to the court’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DorrikasMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. HaveyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. HueyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. People v. SeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Vincent Maglaya v. Raymond J. Buchkoe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. People v. BelcherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. McGathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API