People v. Seaton
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.
Defendant was informed against in the Mecosta circuit court for a violation of the prohibition law. The information contained two counts, one for making a sale of intoxicating liquor and one for having in his possession intoxicating liquor. To maintain the first count the prosecutor showed by the two boys that they bought a pint of liquor from defendant on the date stated.' To maintain the second count the prosecutor showed another sale and delivery of intoxicating liquor by defendant to Arthur Jensen on the same date. This latter testimony was objected to on the ground that it was an attempt…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. McCreaMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MaglayaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1972