Legal Opinion
State v. Ott
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 2012No. 12-KA-111PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARC E. JOHNSON, Judge.
^Defendant, Daniel Ott, appeals his convictions and sentences from the 24th Judicial District Court, Division “I”, resulting from his guilty pleas, asserting the pleas were involuntary and unknowingly made. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s convictions; vacate his sentence on Count Two and remand for resentenc-*947mg; remand for clarification of sentences, and remand for correction of the commitment in conformity with this opinion. Additionally, the appointed appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS
On December 18,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. OliveauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. JamisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. FaggardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- State v. GriffinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- State v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- State v. MooreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.