Legal Opinion

Archie v. Shell Oil Company

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1953No. Civ. A. 2804PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, District Judge.

Wilbur O. Archie, a resident of California, filed a complaint- in forma pauperis in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against the defendant oil companies alleging that Archie was the owner of an undivided' mineral interest in certain lands in Terrebonne Parish, Louisiana, from which the defendants were producing oil and gas and failing to account to plaintiff for his share. Defendants moved to dismiss for failure to ■join indispensable parties, and in the alternative to- transfer the case to this court. The motion to dismiss was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louque v. DejanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  2. Rush v. LandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Ideal Savings & Homestead Ass'n v. GouldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  4. Provenzano v. GlaesserSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. Gordon v. ValleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. California League of Independent Insurance Producers v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1959
  2. Honey v. George Hyman Construction Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. Klamath-Lake Pharmaceutical Association v. Klamath Medical Service BureauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Goldberg v. Wharf ConstructersDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962
  5. Barker v. Jackson National Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API