Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Hill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1976No. 47364PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice:

Appellees, Howard and Bess Phillips (plaintiffs) commenced proceedings to cancel a lease-rental and option to purchase contract wherein .plaintiffs were the lessors-optionors and appellant W. A. Hill (defendant) was the lessee-optionee. The trial court determined all factual issues in favor of plaintiffs; cancelled the lease-rental and option to purchase contract ; quieted plaintiffs’ title; and ordered defendant to surrender immediate possession. Defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Defendant seeks certiorari.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Illinois Merchants Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Estfan v. HawksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  2. Summa Corp. v. RichardsonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API