Phillips v. Hill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Appellees, Howard and Bess Phillips (plaintiffs) commenced proceedings to cancel a lease-rental and option to purchase contract wherein .plaintiffs were the lessors-optionors and appellant W. A. Hill (defendant) was the lessee-optionee. The trial court determined all factual issues in favor of plaintiffs; cancelled the lease-rental and option to purchase contract ; quieted plaintiffs’ title; and ordered defendant to surrender immediate possession. Defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals, Division No. 2, affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Defendant seeks certiorari.
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keogh v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
- Larsen Sheep Co. v. SjogrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1951
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Illinois Merchants Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Estfan v. HawksSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
3Cited by3 opinions
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Summa Corp. v. RichardsonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- McGINNITY v. KIRKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015