Legal Opinion

Zepeda v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1999No. Nos. 04-98-01032-CR, 04-98-01033-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Juan Zepeda appeals the denial of “shock probation,” for which we have no jurisdiction. Houlihan v. State, 579 S.W.2d 213, 216 (Tex.Crim.App.1979); see also Perez v. State, 938 S.W.2d 761, 762 (Tex.App.-Austin 1997, pet. ref d) (finding no jurisdiction over order granting shock probation). Zepeda invites us to construe his appeals as writs of habeas corpus, as the Court of Criminal Appeals did in Houlihan. See 579 S.W.2d at 216-17. We decline to do so because, unlike the Court of Criminal Appeals, we do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters. See In re S.G.,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Houlihan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Perez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. In re S.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bernard Winfield Shortt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  2. Charles George Gould v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2009
  3. Herminia Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. James Edward Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
  5. Shortt, Bernard WinfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API