Legal Opinion

Pomerantz v. Green

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 21, 1991No. 1900716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Justice.

Martin Pomerantz and Quad Cities Nissan, Inc. (“Quad Cities”), filed an action against G. Olen Green and Shoals Nissan, Inc., predecessor to G. Group, Inc., alleging fraud and misrepresentation. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the defendants on all six counts of the complaint, and Pomerantz and Quad Cities appeal.

The standard used to determine the propriety of a summary judgment is found in Rule 56(c), A.R.Civ.P.:

“The judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Schoen v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pomerantz v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API