Legal Opinion

Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. v. Tee's Ave., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1996No. 95 Civ. 9358 (DAB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BATTS, District Judge.

The Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, for trademark infringement allegedly committed by the Defendants. Defendants M & N Co., Inc., Sweatshirts & More, Inc., SSM Sportswear, Abio Sport, Inc., Frederick Wedin, Sammy Zamir, Sid Block and Abraham Spitzer (collectively “M & N Defendants”), now move to dismiss the Complaint, Amended Complaint, Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. 1

I. BACKGROUND

On November 3, 1995, based on Plaintiffs’ submissions, including Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Ricciuti v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Bolt Electric, Inc. v. The City of New York, Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conopco, Inc. v. 2026 Third Realty, LLC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API