Tommy Hilfiger Licensing, Inc. v. Tee's Ave., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
The Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, for trademark infringement allegedly committed by the Defendants. Defendants M & N Co., Inc., Sweatshirts & More, Inc., SSM Sportswear, Abio Sport, Inc., Frederick Wedin, Sammy Zamir, Sid Block and Abraham Spitzer (collectively “M & N Defendants”), now move to dismiss the Complaint, Amended Complaint, Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction. 1
I. BACKGROUND
On November 3, 1995, based on Plaintiffs’ submissions, including Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Ricciuti v. Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Bolt Electric, Inc. v. The City of New York, Spring City Electrical Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conopco, Inc. v. 2026 Third Realty, LLC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Salhotra v. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020