(PC) Quezada v. Akabike
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALVARO QUEZADA, Case No. 1:18-cv-00797-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART 13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 AKABIKE, et al., (Doc. 41) 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s third amended complaint. 18 (Doc. 41.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that the motion be granted in 19 part and denied in part. 20 I. LEGAL STANDARDS 21 A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.