Legal Opinion

Denman v. Quin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1938No. 10444PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Leroy G. Denman and others, qualified taxpaying voters of the city of San Antonio, brought this action in behalf of themselves and of all others in the named class, against the city of San Antonio, its Mayor, commissioners, and clerk, to compel them, by mandamus, to proceed under the provisions of section 131 of the City Charter to open a register to enable the voters in said class to sign said register in initiation of a referendum to veto an ordinance enacted by the Board of City Commissioners on March 3, 1938, levying an ad valorem tax of $1.90 on the $100 property…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Taxpayers' Association v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State Ex Rel. Keefe v. City of St. PetersburgSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Dallas Railway Co. v. GellerTexas Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Glass v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. City of Austin v. Quick, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  3. Shapiro v. Essex Cty. Freeholders Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Garvin v. Ninth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API