Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Keefe v. City of St. Petersburg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 2, 1933PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a mandamus proceeding by bond holders of the City of St. Petersburg seeking to require the respondents, as city officials, to revise their budget and to levy taxes necessary to pay the interest on the bonds which relators hold.

One of the commands of the alternative writ is that a single and uniform rate of taxation be required to be levied over all of the property in the city, as the limits thereof are defined by Chapter 15505, Special Acts 1931, Laws of Florida. The city officials resist this command on the ground that it is inconsistent with the practice which the city has…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dos Anigos, Inc. v. LehmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. State v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. CUPROWSKI v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  3. Denman v. QuinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Sherrill v. MilamSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API