Legal Opinion

Kugel v. Young

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 28, 1955No. 17517PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

*531Action was commenced by plaintiffs in error to remove cloud from and quiet title to certain lands situate in the counties of Adams and Washington and, specifically, to have decreed the cancellation of an oil and gas lease in so far as the same had been assigned to and was then held by defendants in error. The plaintiffs Hogsett were and are the owners of the record title to said lands while plaintiffs Kugel, Hartman and Stroh acquired interests therein through purchase contracts and other agreements with the Hogsetts.

In the fall of 1950 the Hogsetts, Kugel and Hartman executed an oil and gas…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mitchell v. SimmsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Valentine Oil Co. v. PowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Guerra v. ChancellorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Young v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Union Rural Electric Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. Long v. Magnolia Petroleum CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fremont Lumber Co. v. Starrell Petroleum Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Woodside v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Oliner v. City of EnglewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API