Legal Opinion

Loomis v. Whitehead

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2008No. 47362PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORRECTED OPINION1

2Per curiam

In this appeal, we address whether NRS 602.070 bars the partners of an unregistered fictitious name partnership from bringing an action arising out of a business agreement that was not made under the fictitious name. NRS 602.070 prohibits persons who fail to file an assumed or fictitious name certificate from suing on any contract or agreement made under the assumed or fictitious name. We conclude that NRS 602.070 does not bar the partners from bringing the action so long as the partners did not conduct the business or enter into an agreement under the fictitious name or…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Harris Associates v. Clark County School DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Brad Associates v. Nevada Federal Financial Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. KILGORE VS. KILGORENevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Chicago Title Of Nev., Inc. Vs. Chtd. Holdings, Inc. C/W 80116Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Chicago Title Of Nev., Inc. Vs. Chtd. Holdings, Inc. C/W 80116Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Loomis v. WhiteheadNevada Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API