Legal Opinion

Shank v. Shank

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1984No. 15312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order reinstating alimony payments. Appellant contends that his alimony obligations were terminated because of respondent’s remarriage. We agree, and therefore we reverse the district court’s order.

Appellant and respondent were divorced on June 27, 1981. The divorce decree required appellant to pay alimony of $400.00 per month for ten years, followed by $200.00 per month for an additional ten years. The divorce decree provided, however, that alimony would terminate if respondent remarried.

Appellant made timely alimony payments until December 12, 1981, when…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sefton v. SeftonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Glass v. GlassMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilman v. GilmanNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Seaton v. SeatonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Joye v. YonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Joye v. YonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Fredo v. FredoConnecticut Superior Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API