Legal Opinion

Burque v. Brodeur

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 5, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

No argument having been presented by the defendant in support of his exception to the overruling of his demurrer it is assumed that all objections to the form of proceeding and to the sufficiency of the pleadings have been waived and we proceed at once to a consideration of the merits of the case.

At the time of the transactions here involved the defendant was licensed to do business under the terms of the small loans act (P. L., c. 269). The essential provisions of this act are (1) that only licensees are permitted to charge more than 6% interest upon loans of $300 or less (s. 1); (2) that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McConnell v. LamontagneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. M. A. Albertson & Co. v. ShentonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
  3. Bunker v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  4. Conway Savings Bank v. DowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1897
  5. Howard v. FletcherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Motor Credit Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  2. Hull v. Brandywine Fibre Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
  3. Currier v. TuckSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  4. Smetal Corporation v. Family Loan Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. The Morris Plan Co. of R.I. v. Di StefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API